1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the first instance judgment of the first instance court, the first instance court’s “The monthly rent of KRW 8,523,300” in the first instance judgment is “The monthly rent of KRW 8,523,00” in the 7th instance judgment below, and it is difficult to conduct the 7th instance judgment below.

Then, the following is added (the Defendant appears to have moved its head office to the I Office before October 13, 201, which is the date of the acquisition of the instant real estate, on the ground that the minutes indicated on September 7, 201 as to the scheduled establishment of the I Office of the Plaintiff’s Seoul Office, the Plaintiff appears to have moved to the I Office before October 13, 201, which is the date of the acquisition of the instant real estate. However, the contents of the minutes are merely the response of the Plaintiff’s proposing that the following meeting was defective at the S Office’s Seoul office, and thereafter, the meeting was held on September 30, 201, and thus, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff had moved to the I Office before the date of acquisition of the instant real estate, with the contents written in the minutes written in the minutes written in the first instance judgment).

"Additional details of the following" are added (In addition, the plaintiff delivered articles, such as chemical cryp, etc., to the head office on November 16, 201, which is after the date of acquisition of the real estate of this case, (Evidence A32), and around August 201, to October 2011, the expenditure of food and beverage expenses, etc. (Evidence A21) for the human members of the head office of Pyeongtaek-si was also a considerable level of expenditure of food and beverage expenses, etc. for the human members of Pyeongtaek-si head office)

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.