Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, Defendant B and C shall be sentenced to six months of imprisonment, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, from January 1, 2004, worked as the principal of P middle school belonging to the educational foundation A from around January 1, 2004 to the present day, is a person who has overall control over the management and operation of P middle school, including employment of new teachers, management of school funds, etc.

A. (1) On December 2013, the Defendant was working for a fixed-term teacher at the P secondary school principal of the victim educational foundation P secondary school located in Q Q Q as of December 2, 2013.

The reason why R, upon the request of the R’s mother B, “a request to employ R as a regular teacher,” was accepted by an illegal solicitation, and then, on January 2014, R was employed as a teacher of a P middle school in an unlawful manner by notifying R in advance of “the examination for the employment of regular teachers for P middle school” to the P middle school principal in the P middle school principal office.

On February 2, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 60 million in cash from S in return for the Defendant to employ R as a regular teacher of P middle school within a chip car in the P middle school.

As a result, the defendant acquired property in return for an illegal solicitation as to his duties as a person who administers another's business.

(B) On January 31, 2015, at around 10:30 on January 31, 2015, the Defendant issued a request to the board of directors to appoint T as a teacher upon receiving an illegal request from P middle school principal C, which is the mother of T, to employ T as a regular teacher, so that T may be employed as a regular teacher upon the resolution of the board of directors.

On March 2015, the Defendant received KRW 50 million in cash from C in return for the employment of T in the principal of P middle school as a regular teacher of P middle school in the middle school.

As a result, the defendant acquired property in return for an illegal solicitation as to his duties as a person who administers another's business.

(3) The Defendant received money and valuables related to the solicitation of subcontracted construction works at the time of not more than the time of appearance on September 2014.