Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding seven million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On March 27, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the Changwon District Court's branch on the same day; on November 30 of the same year, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 1,200,000 to a fine for the same crime; on September 4, 2013, the Defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act on two or more occasions by receiving a summary order of KRW 4 million from the vice branch of the Daegu District Court's Branch on the same offense; on June 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Seo-gu District Court's branch on the same day, and on the 25th of the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around 04:30 on January 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a C rocketing car with alcohol content of at least 0.068% in the 1km section from the front of the Saemaeul Station located in the new-dong, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong to the maltrem intersection at the same time as that of the new cancer-dong, the Defendant driven a C rocketing car with alcohol content of at least 0.068% in alcohol level.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

At around 04:30 on January 19, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.068% during blood, driven the said rocketing car with the alcohol content 0.068%, and became to turn to the left from the border of Daegu-gu New Cancer-dong to the peace market.

At the time, the defendant was proceeding as one lane for the U-turn, and the two-lanes for the left-hand turn, the two-lanes for the right-hand turn, there were two-lanes for the victim D (18 tax) and in such cases, there was a duty of care to make a left-hand turn at sufficient intervals while changing the two-lanes to the two-lanes for the left or making a left-hand turn at the two-lanes.

Nevertheless, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to turn to the left at the same lane, has come from the two-lane to the intersection.