logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.10.30 2018가합13250
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 153,536,385 as well as 5% per annum from November 17, 2013 to October 30, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 15, 2011, the Plaintiff purchased and used the motor vehicle manufactured by the Defendant from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”) under the name of B.

B. On November 17, 2013, around 08:47, the Plaintiff: (a) boarded the vehicle of this case on the driver’s cabk and carried out the installation work of external lighting lighting on the building; (b) the cler of the instant vehicle was cut; and (c) the Plaintiff fell in the burner.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The Plaintiff suffered from the instant accident, due to the instant accident, injury, such as submergating the right pelle, pel-combined external wounds, pelkeing the right upper, pelkeing the right upper, pelkeing the upper pelke, pulververververing the upper right upper part, lavering the right upper part, lavering the opening of the upper part of the water surface, and pelkeitising the upper part.

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence Nos. 2, 4, 5, Evidence Nos. 7-1 and 7-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. A manufacturer who manufactures and sells articles that have arisen from liability for damages is liable to manufacture and sell such products with safety and durability within the expected extent in light of their technological level and economic feasibility at the time of their distribution, in terms of their structure, quality, performance, etc., and where any defect fails to meet such safety and durability causes damage to consumers, he/she shall be liable to compensate for damage resulting from tort;

In order to impose liability for damages on a manufacturer of goods, the existence of the causal relationship between the existence of the defect, the occurrence of the damage and the occurrence of the damage should be presumed. However, if the manufacturer is liable for damages on the ground of the defect of the goods manufactured in large quantity due to the concentration of high technology, the process of manufacturing the goods can only be known by the manufacturer who is an expert, and the existence of any defect, and whether or not the damage was caused by the defect, is the consumer's side.

arrow