Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 4, 2017, at around 22:15, the Defendant: (a) damaged the property in front of the bus stops in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) on the road front of the bus stops; and (c) on the road, the victim D owned by the victim D, who parked on the roadside, walked a pandeer in front of the steering edge of the E-topcar car owned by the victim, thereby damaging the 200,000 won of the repair cost.

2. Around July 4, 2017, the Defendant was at the place specified in the foregoing Paragraph 1, and at around 22:30 on July 4, 2017, the Defendant confirmed the Defendant’s personal information, while the police officer G (34 tax) who belongs to the police station of the Suwon-gu Police Station, Suwon-gu, Seoul Special Police Station, the Defendant was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 due to the Defendant’s act of destroying property, etc., the Defendant seems to have met only one set of the Defendant’s identity toward the Defendant’s victim.

“In doing so, at one time, the victim’s face part of the victim’s face was inflicted on the victim, who was in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, with the victim’s own bath, such as blood transfusion from fright, frighting frighting, etc.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases, and at the same time injured the above victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. A statement prepared by H;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements from victims of damage to property by telephone);

1. Photographss, etc. of parts damaged by damage and assault;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of inflicting bodily injury on police officers in the course of exercising violence against police officers who properly perform their duties for the reason of sentencing as prescribed by Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, shall not be mitigated.

However, the defendant recognizes the crime of this case.