A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 21, 2018, at around 01:00, the Defendant damaged the victim C-owned D-owned vehicle that was parked in front of Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, by emitting the front panion of the D-owned D-owned vehicle, by hand, by cutting off the vehicle, by hand.

2. As the victim F, who is the police officer belonging to the Daejeon Police Station E box of the Daejeon Police Station, dispatched to the scene after receiving a report on the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, demanded to present his/her identification card, the Defendant openly insultingd the victim by openly bit of a bit of bit of a bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of

3. On June 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as an offender in the act of committing a crime while riding a spit; and (b) continued to take the spit while taking the spit in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, while taking the spit, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of a police officer by spiting the H two times, who is the police officer belonging to the said police box, while taking the spit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the victim;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 311 and 136 (1) (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant reflects his/her wrong, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim of the damage to property, and the fact that the defendant has no past record of punishment exceeding the fine);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act of the community service order;