The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was cut off by: around 15:19, around 2015, the Defendant, at the entrance of 550, half-ro 550, the Busan Shipping Daegu-ro, and then, at the entrance of each market, the Defendant stolen the agricultural products using three strings in each market. The Defendant: (a) the victim C (72 years of age) satisfing a test color tag in the process of passing through the box; (b) one driver’s license certificate; (c) one driver’s license certificate; (d) one copy of the disabled card; and (b) one copy of the Korean card; and (c) one copy of the Korean physical card.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel denied all the facts charged in the instant case by asserting that the Defendant merely sought to return the wallets as indicated in the facts charged, and that there was no intention to acquire it.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it can be acknowledged that the defendant puts the above wall at the entrance of each market at around 15:19, and the defendant puts the wall at the top of the six post offices, Gonsan, 6-dong, Gonsan, 2015, around September 4, 2015, after the lapse of one week.

The following facts revealed from the above facts, namely, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the defendant used the body card, etc. containing the victim's wall, ② there is no criminal record of larceny; ③ if the defendant attempted to obtain the wallet from the victim, it seems that there is no reason to put the above wall in the body box; ④ even though the defendant had a considerable period of time from the date of the wallet, the above wallet was put in the body box after the expiration of a considerable period of time.

Even if an elderly defendant was aware of the finding of a wall, and it cannot be ruled out that the existence of the wall cannot be confirmed again and that it could not be put it into the mail, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor is alone.