logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.06.10 2016고단1620
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

Defendant

In respect of B, this decision is delivered.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on July 24, 2014, after being sentenced to ten months for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act in the Busan District Court, the same military power has been more than three times in addition to the completion of the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on February 27, 2015.

"2016 Highest 16.20 - Defendant A dealt with narcotics, etc. despite the fact that he/she is not a narcotics handler, as follows:

1. On April 5, 2016, at the F police station type office located in Busan E, the Defendant possessed narcotics, etc. by inserting approximately 0.33g of plastic bags and disposable injection equipment containing approximately 0.1g of plastic phone 0.33g, which is a local mental medicine, in the office of the F police station type office located in Busan, (hereinafter referred to as “clockphone”).

2. On April 4, 2016, at around 09:00, the Defendant administered narcotics, etc. by dilution approximately 0.03g of scopon into water at the Defendant’s residence located in the Busan Northern-gu G, Busan-gu.

【2016 Highest 2081 - Defendants treated narcotics as follows even though they are not narcotics handlers.

1. The Defendant, on February 1, 2016, administered narcotics, etc. by dilution approximately 0.03 g of Melopon (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) at the residence of A located in Busan Northern-gu, Busan-gu, and Melopon (one philopon; hereinafter “Wlopon”).

2. On March 17, 2016, the Defendants were in mind to administer philophones at the same place as above; Defendant A put the philophones into a single-use injection machine with approximately 0.03gs, dilution with water; first, he injected them into one’s arms, and continuously injected philophones into Defendant B’s arms.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to administer narcotics.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Highest 1620]

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the above accused by the prosecution;

1. Preliminary experiment for narcotics;

arrow