Text
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
On October 30, 2012, the Defendant’s ground B, which was the Plaintiff on October 30, 201.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On February 23, 2007, the Plaintiff obtained a building permit to newly build a multi-family house on the land of B B large 663 square meters and C large 663 square meters from the Defendant in Ansan-si, and after obtaining a building permit to build a multi-family house on the land of B large 663 square meters and C large 663 square meters from the Defendant, on several occasions, after obtaining permission to change the location, height, area, etc. of the building on October 23, 2007, the Defendant’s building permit and the Plaintiff’s construction permit and the Plaintiff’s construction commencement.
(2) On December 24, 2007, the building area No. 262.10 square meters, total floor area No. 655.50 square meters, and building structure of reinforced concrete (17 households) of multi-family houses for the use of detached houses (hereinafter “instant B”), and each of the above buildings is collectively referred to as “each of the instant houses.”
2) Each of the instant housing units was built with a studio and a studio for the purpose of moving into the 17 households for each building. The instant housing units was built with a 2nd-down room and a 2nd-down room and a 2nd-down room for each building, a 2nd-down room and a 3nd-down room for each building.
However, the Plaintiff installed a separate studio on the parts designed to be built with the intention to increase the number of households compared to the original contents of permission, and installed a separate studio for electric gas facilities and toilets, and installed 24, not 17 measuring instruments and mail boxes for each building.
In addition, with respect to each of the houses of this case, prior to obtaining approval for use from the defendant, the building began to be used with the occupant.
B. On January 7, 2008, the construction supervisor requested correction of the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s corrective order of each of the instant housing units, pursuant to Article 25(2) of the Building Act, to construct the number of households of each of the instant housing units to the Plaintiff on January 7, 2008, and requested correction.