Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Attachment] (State) The above company, such as the location C, was in the corporate register of the head office from January 2, 2008 to February 1, 2010 and was in the corporate register of the head office, "Seoul Gangnam-gu DD building Non-714." However, in fact, the representative director E used the same building Non-1019, which is the domicile of the representative director E, and no one was located in the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.
The above company was established for the purpose of doing the Mongolian Mine Development Business, etc., and the representative director from November 13, 2007 to 2008
2. E was from February 11, 2008 to July 16, 2009, and H was from July 16, 2009 to July 16, 2009.
( state) Although the location of the principal office of the said company, such as I (Representative J) and the Defendant, etc., was “Seosan-gu K”, the said company was actually engaged in the fund-raising business without delay in the vicinity of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L.
On November 1, 2008, the Defendant purchased shares of 90 million won and received a certificate of stock custody and receipt from a person who has not been killed in the name of his employee (for example, “M”) from the above company’s employees.
N on July 29, 2008, N borrowed one billion won to G, a representative director of C, at the time of the loan.
N did not have a direct business relationship with the Defendant and did not issue a loan certificate to the Defendant. From July 1, 2007 to January 7, 2009, N was registered in the registry in Busan Northern-gu, and transferred the domicile to Seoul Seocho-gu P building 101 on January 16, 2009.
【Criminal Facts】
In collusion with husband Q, the Defendant invested KRW 90 million in I, and even though it is irrelevant to C and N, the Defendant forged a certificate of borrowing KRW 90 million in the name of C representative E and N, thereby provisionally seizing the claim for the refund of the lease deposit against C, and applied for a payment order against C to obtain a payment order against C, and decided to receive the attachment of the claim and the order for the attachment of the entire claim.
1. The Defendant who forged private documents in collusion with Q Q for the purpose of uttering in Seoul and abroad during the end of January 16, 2009 to August 201, Q Q used a computer.