logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.10.20 2016나2053129
불법행위로 인한 손해배상 등
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against Plaintiff SBS in the judgment is modified as follows. A.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance and its modification are as follows, except for the following changes, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

From 7 pages 1 to 20 of the first instance judgment, the part of the “the Defendant’s liability for damages against Plaintiff SPEB” was deleted. From 7 pages 1 to 3 of the first instance judgment, the scope of the liability for damages “B 4.” is corrected from 7 pages 7 of the first instance judgment to “B 3.” The part of “from 14 February 2013” as “from 9:0 on February 14, 2013.” The part of the first instance judgment from 9 pages 9 to 10 pages 2 of the first instance judgment is deleted from 10 pages 9 to 10.

Judgment

Since it is difficult to see that there are parts to be cited in excess of the amount of damages for each of the plaintiffs' selective claims recognized earlier, the plaintiffs' remaining selective claims are rejected.

2. In conclusion, the part of the judgment of the first instance against Plaintiff SBS is deemed to be unfair, and thus, the judgment of the first instance is to be modified. The appeal against the Defendant of the Plaintiff’s Korean Broadcasting System, the Plaintiff’s cultural broadcast, and the appeal against Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s Korean Broadcasting System and the Plaintiff’s cultural broadcast are all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow