Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for one year, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 5, 2009, Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 13th day of the same month.

【Criminal Facts】

No one shall engage in the business of providing users with property benefits, etc. according to the outcome of friendship by using speculative instruments, etc. which are feared to attract speculative spirit, such as speculative electronic machines.

Defendant

B is a mutually influorous game room unemployment in the original city, Nowon-gu, Seoul branch, and the defendant A is a president in the name of the defendant, such as providing his own name to the real estate lease contract, compared to the time when the game site was regulated.

Defendants from June 28, 2008 to the same year

7.1. up to 1. up to 1., at the above game room, multiple unspecified customers who found the above game room have installed and operated 40 erode game machine, which is a speculative machine, 39 erode game machine, and a total of 79 erode.g., 4,500 won excluding the fee of 10% per 10% per erode, after the opening of the game room and being granted 10,000 won. If 20,00 won won won is won, in accordance with the patternless arrangement of the pattern appearing on the game screen which is shown on the game screen, the number of unspecified customers who found the above game room will be released, and 4,500 won, excluding the fee of 10% per erode.g., the rest of the game room.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit speculative acts such as giving property benefits or losses to the users according to the incidental outcome by using machines that are likely to attract speculative spirit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each statement of E, F and G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: An inquiry report shall be made to make an inquiry;