1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 29, 2016, the Plaintiff signed a contract with Defendant B District Housing Association Promotion Committee (hereinafter “Defendant Promotion Committee”) and the agency company E (hereinafter “E”) to purchase one apartment unit (59m2) that will be newly constructed in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, to purchase the association (hereinafter “instant contract to join the association”), and the main contents are as follows.

Article 1 / [Purpose] (1) In order to promote a regional housing association as a project undertaker under Article 32 of the Housing Act, Article 37 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and Article 17 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, that the marked scale of the object can be somewhat changed depending on the progress of the project, the process of authorization and permission, or the result of the survey / [Purpose], in order to promote a regional housing association and a non-resident housing construction project, B (Plaintiff) will enter into this contract with the association in a state where the approval of the project is not determined as a qualified housing partner, and B (Defendant Promotion Committee) will agree to the execution of the project in order to promote the project in whole

Article 4 (Contributions to Cooperative Members and Vicarious Execution Expenses) A shall bear and pay the cooperative members contributions and vicarious execution expenses for the project as follows:

The agency cost for the project implementation service of the association of 307,50,000,000 m20,000,000 m20,000 (6) m20,000 m2,000 m2, 59m2,000 m2,00 m2,00 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,00,000 m2,00