logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2011.8.25. 선고 2011두10072 판결
시효소멸로처분취소
Cases

2011du1072 Revocation of disposition on the expiration of prescription

Plaintiff-Appellant

■■■■■■

Defendant-Appellee

The head of the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Office Seoul Western Site

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2010Nu39092 Decided April 20, 201

Imposition of Judgment

August 25, 2011

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Judges

Justices Min Il-young

Justices Kim Gi-hwan in charge

Justices Noh Jeong-hee

Justices Lee In-bok

arrow