The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On July 4, 2013, at the office of the Military Branch of D Organizations, located in the territory of the Republic of Korea-U.S., the Defendant publicly insultingd the victims of the victims, on the ground that: (a) the resolution to dismiss the victims themselves at an extraordinary session of the D Association, located in the territory of the Military Branch of D Organizations, located in the Republic of Korea-U.S. on July 4, 2013; (b) the victim E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, L, M, N,O, P, R, and other employees of the D Association; (c) on the ground that the resolution to dismiss the victims was null and void.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, J and G;

1. Each police statement to E and J;

1. A complaint filed by E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, and P;

1. According to the facts stated in the judgment of the victims, it is recognized that the Defendant stated that “T’s sewage will be cut off or satisfyed, satched, and satisfyed,” as stated in the facts of the crime committed by the victims, among the employees of the Korea War Veterans Association, the Defendant’s investigation report (U and QB speech related to each evidence) (i.e., the victims and the members of the Korea War Veterans Association) (i., the victims, and (ii) the members of the Korea War Veterans Association in addition to the victims, the performance is recognized as recognized. The Defendant’s words at the time constitute insult by expressing abstract judgments or anti-satisfy sentiments that could undermine the social evaluation of the victims. The Defendant asserted that the Defendant’s above act was a justifiable act that does not violate the social norms, but in light of the motive, background, degree of insulting expressions, and proportion of insulting expressions, the Defendant’s assertion in this part of this part is not accepted).

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The fine to be suspended shall be five hundred thousand won;