logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.07.01 2015가단115848
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff);

A. As to each real estate listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the attached Table 1 to Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. On July 26, 2012, Plaintiff A entered into a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase each real estate listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the attached Table Nos. 1 and 2 of the attached Table with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant sales contract”). The remainder 2.3 million won was paid as of November 30, 2012, and the down payment was deemed as the basis for compensation for damage. Subsequent development contributions were paid to the Defendant on the same day as the down payment and the intermediate payment. ② On July 28, 2012, Plaintiff B and the seller concluded a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase each real estate of KRW 30 million under the name of the Plaintiff’s list No. 3 and 4 of the attached Table No. 3 and KRW 90 million (hereinafter “the intermediate payment”) and the intermediate payment of KRW 2.7 million was to be paid at the end of the sales contract with the Defendant on the same day, and the remainder was to be paid at KRW 1,700,000,000.

(2) Each of the above sales contracts (hereinafter referred to as "each of the above sales contracts of this case", and "each of the above real estates of this case", and when one of the above real estates of this case has been set out, "the real estate of this case" according to the relevant sequence listed in the separate sheet. 【The ground for recognition' exists. 【The fact that there is no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 3, 10, and 12 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply)'s each of the above sales contracts,

2. As to the main claim

A. On the premise that each of the instant sales contracts is valid, the Plaintiffs’ assertions of the parties are paid KRW 176,950,000 from the Plaintiff (i.e., any remainder of KRW 203,000,000 - Development Contributions 26,050,000). At the same time, the Defendant was paid to the Plaintiff A with the remainder of KRW 176,950,00.

arrow