1. At the same time, the Defendant received KRW 85,00,000 from the Plaintiffs, as well as to the Plaintiffs:

(a) the annexed list;

1. Basic facts

A. On November 5, 2015, the Plaintiffs purchased real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) from the Defendant from the Defendant to pay the purchase price of KRW 220 million, the down payment of KRW 20 million, the down payment of KRW 20 million, and the down payment of KRW 48 million from the contract date, December 4, 2015, and KRW 20 million from the intermediate payment of KRW 130 million from January 5, 2016 to the payment of KRW 130 million as of February 18, 2016. As a special agreement, the Plaintiffs agreed to pay KRW 50 million from the first floor lessee of the instant real estate, and to pay KRW 50 million on the delivery date if India becomes aware.

B. After that, the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) increased the purchase price on December 3, 2015 in KRW 5 million; (b) changed the increased amount in KRW 25 million to the intermediate payment; and (c) paid the increased amount in the intermediate payment; (b) the first intermediate payment is KRW 58 million to the intermediate payment; and (c) the second intermediate payment is KRW 15 million to the lessee; and (d) the lessee’s deposit is paid to the Defendant.

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs paid KRW 10 million on December 1, 2015, and KRW 48 million on December 2, 2015 as part payments. D.

However, on December 23, 2015, the Defendant requested the Plaintiffs to pay KRW 60 million out of the lease deposit by December 25, 2015, and the Plaintiffs paid KRW 60 million by January 11, 2016, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant paid KRW 140 million to the Defendant as the down payment and the intermediate payment by January 11, 2016, and the remainder amount is expected to be paid by February 18, 2016. The Defendant prepared a “sale price confirmation document” with the purport that the Plaintiffs should deliver and transfer the instant real estate on the remainder date, and the Plaintiffs should pay the remainder on the remainder date.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination, the defendant received 85 million won payment from the plaintiffs, and at the same time, received the plaintiffs with respect to the real estate in this case.