logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.11.10 2016고단3008
특수상해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Provided, That the execution of each of the above punishments shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A around 01:00 on June 18, 2016, at the main point of “F” located on the fourth floor of the building in Jindo-si, Jindo-si, Jindo-si, Seoul, on the ground that the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, had the victim satisfying the victim’s her thro while drinking, with the victim’s her thringing of the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her satch, and had the victim’s her face by drinking her her her her hand, and had the victim’s her her her her satch, and continued to collect the her her her her satch. On the other hand, Defendant A her her her her head was her hand, her her head at the same time.

As a result, the defendant carried a beer, which is a dangerous thing, and inflicted bodily injury on the victim for about 14 days in need of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), was assaulted by the victim A (the age of 51) as seen above, and was laid down around the entrance door of the above station, and she laid down the beer’s disease, which was accumulated around the beer’s entrance, and the victim her was forced to take the head of the victim’s disease once by force.

As a result, the Defendant carried a beer disease, which is a dangerous thing, and inflicted injury on the victim, including approximately 21 days of treatment, such as an inner eye (15 cm on the face of the inner face).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;

1. Each police statement to G, H, I, and J;

1. Reports on internal investigation (the sequence 19,24 of the evidence list);

1. Each injury diagnosis letter argues to the effect that co-defendant A and victim B’s injury does not constitute “injury” under the Criminal Act. However, according to the above evidence, Defendant A argues that the injury occurred between Co-defendant A and the victim, following the occurrence of the instant accident, Defendant A’s snow pool and open room around the snow, etc. suffered from Defendant A’s above act from Kwon in Chang-si, Chang-si, Chang-si.

arrow