A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Of the facts charged in this case, the violation of the Oil Pipeline Safety Control Act shall be acquitted.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Gohap 29] The Defendant conspired with the Defendant to steal oil flowing from the oil pipelines managed by the Corporation located in YY E in Jinsisisisisisisisisisido by using the facilities that had been connected to the above pipelines to prevent the flow of oil from the oil pipelines, which are located in 100 meters away from the volume of nearby the oil pipelines.

1. On August 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) from around 20:15 to around 03:00 on August 26, 2014, with a person whose name is unknown; (b) from around 20:15 to around 03:00 of the same month, the Defendant came to fall back in the vicinity of the said pipelines; (c) from around the site, the Defendant came to view the network by cellular phone; (d) parked a truck with oil tanks in the vicinity; and (e) B and C, using high voltages connected to the oil pipelines, deducted 2,00 square meters from the oil pipelines amounting to KRW 3.2 million at the market price.

In other words, the truck box was loaded on the oil tank.

2. On August 27, 2014, the Defendant, along with a person whose name is unknown, has reached the same place as around 20:15 on August 27, 2014, and has deducted 100 liters via the market price equivalent to KRW 1.60,000 in the same method.

In the above truck box, it was loaded on the oil tank.

As a result, the Defendant, together with a person who is not aware of B, C, D, and name, stolen a total of 2,100 square meters via a market price of at least 3,360,000 won.

On October 24, 2014, G 2014, "2018 Gohap 17" was placed in a restaurant where trade names in the vicinity of "I department store" located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon. The victim J introduced a person who can lend his/her business name to K to obtain repayment of KRW 40 million. As for the value-added tax incurred in the future after trading in the name of the business operator, she would be able to inquire us of his/her debt amount of KRW 40,000,000,000, and she introduced L and the defendant.

On October 28, 2014, the Defendant, along with G and L, did not know the trade name in the vicinity of the “I department store”, and the victim did business in the name of the Defendant A.