A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From October 2013, the Defendant was suffering from livering livering infection for the purpose of relaxing pains, and the Defendant was born with the mind that the Defendant would steal the Peatidine (one name “Peatidine”) and the psychotropic drug (one psychotropic drug) from the “Cuma” department (CumaD) where the Defendant was a nurse.

On April 13, 2014, at around 13:00, the Defendant arbitrarily entered the password, which was previously known to the credit cooperative located in the medical care room of a doctor F in the area of “C” located in the Cheongju-si, Sin-si, Cheongju-si, and then cut off with five amplidines equivalent to the total market price of 1,570 won, which is the victim D.

B. At around 13:00 on Apr. 2, 2014, the Defendant, at the location described in the foregoing paragraph (a) in the same manner as described in the foregoing paragraph (a), took a amplion with amplion 15 amplidine equivalent to the sum of 4,710 won at the market price owned by the victim D and stolen.

C. On May 2014, 2014, the Defendant: (a) took 38,454 won in total at the market price of the victim D in the same manner as indicated in paragraph (a) at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph; and (b) stolen 50 amplions, amplion amplion 11 and amplion sclick

2. On May 2014, the Defendant, while serving as a patrolman and a nurse, forged the “application for issuance of a certificate of narcotic purchase and a certificate of narcotic sale” in the name of C outside of C and C, and submitted it to the public health center to obtain a certificate of narcotic purchase for the purpose of medication.

On May 7, 2014, the Defendant printed out the “application for issuance of a certificate of narcotic purchase and a certificate of narcotic sale” using a computer located in the reception stand at the reception stand, and then arbitrarily stated the “personal prestigious saltidine”, “number 200A, 24A,” and “applicant D” on May 7, 2014, and marked the D seal kept in the name of D.

Accordingly, the defendant is under the name of D, a private document concerning rights and obligations without authority for the purpose of uttering.