logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.08.29 2017고단657
가축분뇨의관리및이용에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and fines for 2,000,000 won, and Defendant B’s agricultural partnership shall be punished by a fine for negligence for 5,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A is the representative director of Defendant B’s agricultural partnership located in the 2017 large group of 657, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of spraying liquid manure.

1. From January 21, 2017 to around 16:00 on the same day, Defendant A: (a) from around 10:15 to around 16:00 on the same day, the amount produced at a resource recovery plant for producing liquid manure is not distributed to any place other than the amount secured by the installer of the relevant resource recovery plant; (b) despite the occupational duty to ensure that liquid manure does not flow into the public water area; (c) Defendant A, an engineer of the said company, was obliged to spread approximately 40 tons of livestock excreta on the same land, not on the amount secured by J, a large amount of excreta; and (d) flow it into the neighboring public water area by spraying the amount.

2. The Defendant B, the representative director of the farming association, distributed liquid manure to the land that is not the land for spraying the amount secured as above with respect to the Defendant’s business at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (1), and let the distributed amount flow into neighboring public waters.

Defendant A is the representative director of Defendant B’s agricultural partnership located in the formeranan-gun C, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of spraying liquid manure distribution business.

3. On March 12, 2016, from around 14:00 to around 17:00 on the same day, Defendant A distributed approximately KRW 30 to 17,057 tons of liquid manure on the same land, not on spraying liquid manure in a place other than a place secured by a person who installed a resource recovery plant, even though he/she did not spraying liquid manure.

4. The defendant B, the representative director of the defendant, and the defendant A, have been secured in relation to the defendant's business at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (3).

arrow