logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.12.23 2016고단3557
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer the means of access in using and managing the means of access under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, around June 2014, transferred the means of access to a total of 9 passbooks, cash cards, and OTP cards, including 10 to 150,000 won per time, from that time, to August 26, 2014, from that time, 3 times in total, including 10 to 150,000 won per name, from that time, in the vicinity of the water station located in Suwon-si, 10,000 won per company bank, 10 to 18,000 won per account, 10 to 150,000 won per account.

2. On June 2014, the Defendant, who interfered with the business, created a “corporation” from “G” under the name-free name that he/she became aware of through the Internet advertisement, and proceeds with the loan, if he/she creates a bank account.

After receiving the proposal, the so-called “the so-called “the without substance” corporation H’s representative director to the Defendant, and the Defendant was willing to open a large passbook with the business registration certificate.

Then, around June 24, 2014, the Defendant stated “price for goods at a transaction place” in the column of “financial transaction purpose” in the “financial transaction confirmation document” prepared to eradicate a large passbook, submitting the Plaintiff’s business registration certificate, copy of the Defendant’s resident registration certificate, etc. at Suwon-si’s corporate bank located, and indicated “no matter whether a request for the lending of a passbook was made by another person,” and indicated “no matter how there was a fact of receiving a request for the opening of a passbook from another person for the purpose of credit rating, credit rating, loan, etc.,” and indicated “no matter whether there was a fact of receiving a request for the opening of a passbook from another person,” and then indicated “no matter of the account opening, etc. from

arrow