1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is 68 years of age as of the date of the closing of argument in this case, and “stock company” is omitted from the name of C, which has an office in the fifth floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

A person who actually operates a L Group consisting of foreign corporations, such as D, E, Korea business office, F Tour, G, etc., Japanese corporations, H, Hong Kong corporations, I (I, I, I, I, I, I, E Hong Kong, and J, K, and other foreign corporations established in the Kaman Islands, the tax haven.

B. After conducting a tax investigation with the Plaintiff from October 15, 2010 to March 28, 2011, the Commissioner of the National Tax Service notified the head of the distribution tax office, the head of the Seocho District Tax Office, and the head of Seocho-gu (hereinafter “head of the distribution tax office, etc.”) of the taxation data. Based on the taxation data, the head of the tax office, etc. issued a disposition imposing global income tax (including additional tax) and local income tax (hereinafter “instant taxation disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the instant tax disposition, which was dissatisfied with the instant tax disposition, and the first instance court (Seoul Administrative Court 2012Guhap9437), the appellate court (Seoul High Court 2013Nu27359), the appellate court (Seoul High Court 2015du1243), the appellate court (Seoul High Court 2016Nu324) and the appellate court (Seoul High Court 2016Nu324) are pending in the Supreme Court.

The Defendant issued a disposition to extend the period of prohibition of departure on June 11, 201, upon request of the Commissioner of the National Tax Service to the effect that the Plaintiff is likely to depart from the Republic of Korea for the purpose of evading disposition on national taxes in arrears and evading property overseas, with the period of prohibition of departure from June 11, 201 to December 10, 201, the period of prohibition of departure from the Plaintiff continues to extend the period of prohibition of departure against the Plaintiff, and on February 25, 2019, the Defendant issued a disposition to extend the period of prohibition of departure from the Plaintiff from February 26, 2019 to August 25, 2019.

In addition, the defendant is against the plaintiff on January 8, 2016 at the request of the Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City for prohibition of departure on the grounds of local tax delinquency.