A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine for 200,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. A special intimidation: (a) around 08:40 on July 1, 2015, the Defendant threatened the victim E (52) who is the head of the community service center welfare center in Daegu Suwon-gu C with the victim’s speech that the victim would no longer work in the public sector; (b) on the ground that the victim said the victim’s speech that he/she would no longer work in the public sector; and (c) on the part of the victim, he/she threatened the victim, by using in his/her hand a towing dog for the removal of flaps, which is a dangerous thing in breath of the victim’s flap, and by threatening the victim’s face.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the same date, time, and place as indicated in paragraph 1, and at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph 1, was arrested by G and security guards G and security guards H as a flagrant offender suspected of violence, and the police officer, who wants to board the Defendant on the back seat of the patrol police patrol vehicle at Ihn-Wnn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn, by walking the rear door of the patrol vehicle even one time, thereby damaging the patrol vehicle used by public offices so that the repair cost would amount to 340,360 won.

3. The Defendant violating the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) on July 19, 2015, from around 18:00 to around 18:10 on the same day, the Defendant 4 police officers, such as G, etc., including the following: (b) he/she takes alcohol within the F police box located in the Daegu Suwon-guJ from around 18:00, while voluntarily accompanying him/her for sexual release; and (c) took part in the notification processing; and (d) took part in the complaint against the notification processing.

As a result, the impule gue gue typ saw the 10 minutes of flab, including intending to take a computer monitor on the book, and the flab caused the flab with the 10 minutes of flab.

4. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties was arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender on the same grounds as that described in paragraph (3) at the same place around 18:10 on the same day as that described in paragraph (3), and on the grounds of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, G was merely arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender.

n amba ambada

"The sound was frighten and threatened."

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of crime.

Summary of Evidence

1...