1. On January 16, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision against the Plaintiff on January 16, 2015 that constitutes the requirement for a person eligible for veteran’s compensation, with the escape certificate C3-4, and C4.

1. (i) On August 1, 1994, the Plaintiff entered as a private soldier and was discharged from active service on October 2, 1996, and was discharged from active service on December 10, 2004, and was discharged from active service on June 30, 2014. From December 1, 2008 to June 30, 2014, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service at the Army Private Headquarters B major of the Army Headquarters for the period from December 1 to June 30, 2014.

on July 4, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State, stating the following:

B CD ? The defendant, on January 16, 2015, notified the plaintiff that "the plaintiff's application does not meet the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State," but falls under the requirements for persons eligible for veteran's compensation (including the state of injury in which estimated signboards escape certificate C5-6 (after in the form of artificial disc drive), and ② the c3-4, C4-5 (C4-5-6 (after the c4-5-6 c4, c4-5, c4-5), and urology and urology (after the vegical urgical urgical urgical urgical blag), he shall not meet the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State, as well as the requirements for persons eligible for veteran's compensation."

Applicant and Defendant filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on August 11, 2015, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission rendered a ruling dismissing the above request for administrative appeal.

【Uncontentious facts, Eul’s evidence 1-2, Eul’s evidence 2-1, 2-2, Eul’s evidence 13, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion was under the situation of the maintenance team while serving in the Army Headquarters B (one maintenance team leader and one maintenance team of private communication equipment maintenance team). The plaintiff was also under the duty of the maintenance team's official position. The plaintiff, as a holder of the 4 Taekwondo team, was exposed to an excessive stress and serious stress.

The plaintiff is on April 17, 2009, while serving in force due to the above working conditions.