The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence presented by the prosecutor in the gist of the grounds for appeal, the court below found the defendant not guilty of the defendant, despite the fact that the defendant invadedd the victim's residence, such as the facts charged, and damaged the parts of the victim, which affected the judgment.

2. Determination 1) The summary of the facts charged is as follows: around 23:00 on September 26, 201, the defendant found the above victim's residence Da apartment 102 and 904, which is the victim's residence, and opened the entrance door to the above victim's house, and opened the entrance door to the above victim's house, and damaged the above victim's house, and continued intrusion into the above victim's house, and damaged the victim's market price at an amount of 50,000 won in the above victim's house in the living room. The court below made a statement at the court of the court below, under the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, E (i.e., "the victim's house was prepared or stated differently from the fact that the victim becomes the victim's in the investigation agency, and as such, he was also unable to hear the defendant's scene or the situation after the crime, the victim's statement at the investigation agency's bar was also hard to believe that the victim's entrance was the victim's statement at the court below.