The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the facts) is as follows: (a) the Defendant, as stated in the judgment of the court below, did not have inflicted an injury on the victim D’s face at one time; and (b) the victim’s rears and rears each time by hand, and (c) the lower court recognized the establishment of the crime

Therefore, the court below erred by misunderstanding the facts.

2. Determination

A. On June 25, 2014, the Defendant, at around 08:00, injured the victim’s face on one hand, on the ground that the victimized person, prior to the Defendant’s management E of the victim D (54) in the Daegu-gu Seoul-gu C market, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu (hereinafter referred to as “54”), took an examination on the Defendant’s mother, and caused the victim’s injury, such as the fluoral flag, in need of treatment for about 14 days by hand, on one hand.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of each of the evidence in its judgment.

(c)

(1) The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated in the original trial and the trial at the original trial, i.e., the victim stated in the investigative agency and the court of original trial that “the defendant made the back of the victim”, and ii) the F witnessing the situation at the time of this case in the court of original trial, “the defendant sent the back of the victim to the victim,” and at the time the defendant was shakingd with the victim at the time of this case.

After the fighting, the victim was flicking his/her son and was flick with the defendant.

The term "" refers to the following.

In light of the fact that “A statement is made to the purport that” and “A statement is made by an investigative agency to the effect that “the Defendant is a victim’s tension,” as stated in the facts charged, the Defendant may recognize the back of the victim once as one-time fact, such as the statement in the facts charged, and this may be evaluated as an unlawful exercise of force against the body of the victim, i.e., assault.

2) Abdo, the Defendant had the face of the victim and the number of rears each time, or the victim is weak due to the aforementioned assault.