(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.02 2015가단186930

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.02 2015가단186930

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 125,512,195 to the Plaintiff; and (b) 5% per annum from September 28, 2014 to December 2, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) B: (a) around 10:25 September 28, 2014, CK5 siren (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

) A driver driving his/her motor vehicle and driving his/her motor vehicle led two-lane roads at a point 200.1km away from the opposite side of the Seocheon ICT along the speed of about 110km at a speed of 110km each hour in accordance with the first lane. B is due to the negligence of discovering the speed of the motor vehicle travelling ahead of the same lane and moving down to the right side in order to avoid drilling, and due to the negligence of changing course and moving down to the side, while parked on the side side.

3) The Plaintiff, who followed the water signal, shocked the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) As a result of the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the influorious fever and the influoral frame of the land.

3) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Defendant, as an insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, is liable for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident, barring any special circumstance. D. However, if the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff, has stopped on the side of the expressway due to a breakdown, it was at fault, even though the Plaintiff was at least 100 meters from the vehicle, and the vehicle should have been damaged to the safe place on the side of the expressway, and was at the same time left on the dangerous side, even though the vehicle should have been damaged to the safe place. Such negligence by the Plaintiff was caused by the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s fault ratio to the Plaintiff’s fault shall be 10%, and the Defendant’s liability shall be limited to 90%. [Grounds for recognition], there is no dispute, and there

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the annexed table of calculation of damages shall be the same as each corresponding item, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be monthly.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.30 2016가단156387

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.24 2017가단5105916

-춘천지방법원 2016.01.14 2014가단10246

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.11 2013가단92192

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.12 2014가단5074936