logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.07.07 2017고단658
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From December 13, 2016, around 22:30 on December 13, 2016, the Defendant stolen the thief by opening a door of the driver’s seat of the said observer car, which is the victim’s ownership in the market price, and driving the car at the start with the key located in the stick.

2. The accused is a person who is engaged in driving a F observer car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act;

On December 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.141% in blood at around 22:30 on December 13, 2016, and driven a one-lane road of 0.141% in front of the Seoul Jongno-gu D D D Building on the right side of the luminous shooting distance from the Gu office towards its end.

At the time, since it is night, and the letter is narrow one lane, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle, and by accurately manipulating the steering direction and the system.

Nevertheless, Defendant 1 neglected this while under the influence of alcohol and stopped at the front of the proceeding direction as is, as seen above, the part of the back of the victim G(51) Hast Hayna Ha was driven by the victim G(51) with the front part of the options car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, committed an injury to the said victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. requiring approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, and, at the same time, escaped without taking measures, such as aiding the victimized person by stopping the said taxi, even though the said rocketing taxi was destroyed to bring about approximately KRW 767,402 at the repair cost, such as so on.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. A report on detection of a driver in charge and an investigation report (the alcohol concentration in the blood);

arrow