A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven B observer car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.187% from the 1km section to the front road of the luminous Office of Education located in the luminous-dong at the time of light lighting at around 01:30 on March 20, 2017; and (b) the Defendant driven B observer car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.187% from the 1km section to the front road of the luminous Office of Education located in 7888.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car with B options in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On March 20, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol as set forth in paragraph (1) of around 01:30, while driving the car, and driving the two-lane road in front of the luminous Office of Education, which is located in 788 in the light name of the game, along the two-lanes of the light shooting distance from the luminous shooting distance.

Since there are three-distance crossings, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by maintaining the distance from the front vehicle to those engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the following parts of the victim C(53 S) who was waiting for signal at the front section of the said car in the same direction as the previous part of the said car due to the negligence of operating the car under the influence of alcohol as above.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim E (the victim e, who was on board the back seat of the said rocketing car with approximately 2 weeks of need to be treated, such as salt, tension, etc., and injury to the victim E (the age 50) in need of approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. E statements;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report and a circumstantial report on the driver involved in the driving;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigation report (official application of the aforementioned drone);

1. Article 3 of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts