The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not injure the victim at around 22:35 on May 27, 2013.

2. The lower court determined as follows: (a) according to the evidence of the judgment, the Defendant: (a) requested that D at the time the drinking place was terminated at the Defendant’s home; (b) but D’s bucks that D would not comply with D’s request; (c) sent D’s d’s bucks to get out of the house; and (d) caused D’s knee, knee, kne, and f’s knife, and f’s d’s knife, when the Defendant moved out of the house; (c) reported the Defendant’s house; and (d) reported 112 after the Defendant’s house; and (d) received a written diagnosis of injury to the Defendant that D suffered from each side of the slots, checks, and checks at the hospital following the following day; and (d) according to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant inflicted the above injury in the course of displaying D out of the house.

Examining the judgment of the court below closely after comparison with the records, even if the court below's aforementioned judgment is justified in light of the circumstances that have difficulty in credibility among D's police and each statement in the court of original instance, and it cannot be said that there was an error of mistake of facts as alleged by the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.