The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the summary of the grounds for appeal (in fact-finding assertion) and the statement of G, the defendant can be found to have inflicted an injury on the victim's left chest part by drinking together as stated in the facts charged of this case.

2. Determination

A. The lower court determined as follows: (a) each statement made by the victim and G, which corresponds to the facts charged of the instant case, is consistently asserted as follows: (i) the developments leading up to the assault and the situation at the time of assault (whether there was a franchising the door between the Defendant and the police officer; and (ii) there is no credibility because the Defendant was not consistent or inconsistent with G; and (iii) the Defendant from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court, “the Defendant, who tried not to open a door in which the Defendant, the victim, and G were knife and knife, and knife the door while knife the door was opened, and the victim was knife and knife the door was knife,” and (iii) it was difficult to readily conclude that the victim did not have any other statement on the facts of assault committed to the police officer at the time when the victim was committed with the same assault as the facts charged, even if the victim did not have any doubt about the victim’s body and ke.