The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who works as an employee of the “C cafeteria” as set forth in B of the facts charged.

At around 22:19 on July 23, 2018, the victim D told that he would be able to sprink the Defendant after completing meals at the “Ccafeteria,” but the mobile phone, which was a dangerous object that the Defendant was in possession on the Defendant’s eye, was in the Defendant’s eye, causing an injury to the Defendant, such as acute red spatitis, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment. The Defendant assaulted the victim D with the victim D, and assaulted the victim at one time at the victim’s hand, when the victim was spathered.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Declaration of non-existence of punishment after filing a public prosecution: The written agreement dated June 7, 2019;

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;