logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2017.11.09 2017누4467
개발행위불허가처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this case, such as the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, and the "Supreme Court Decision 2000Du5319 Decided September 26, 200" shall be changed to "Supreme Court Decision 2004Du9619 Decided May 28, 2004" in Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance. The additional evidence submitted in the court of first instance, which is insufficient to recognize the defendant's assertion, are the same as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of the statements in Articles 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified as the conclusion is consistent with this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow