logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2015.08.13 2014나3329
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) Section 4 of the first instance court's judgment "627,283,900 won" in Section 4 of the first instance court's judgment "727,283,900 won"; (b) Section 4 of the same part of the judgment "4, April 1, 201" shall be dismissed as " April 2, 201"; (c) Section 3 of the fifth part of the judgment "B does not have any ground to regard it as a commercial employee with a defendant's partial comprehensive power of attorney under Article 15 of the Commercial Act"; and (d) additional evidence submitted at the trial, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff had entered into an electrical construction contract with the defendant, and therefore, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just and reasonable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow