logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.08.08 2017고단503
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On May 30, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 for a fine of KRW 500,000 for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Cheongju District Court’s Jeju District Court’s Incheon District Court’s support on July 6, 2012 and a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime, respectively.

[2] On May 18, 2017, the Defendant driven a Brodi van while under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.102% from a section of about 500 meters to the road front of the said 57-lane, from the front of a restaurant where the trade name in the voice Eup of the Chungcheongbuk-gun is unknown, to the front of the said Eup.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. The driver's license ledger and the driver's license ledger;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Investigation report (report on the situation of the driver in charge); and

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry about criminal history and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (not less than twice the driving force of drinking);

1. Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the provision of a fine, selection of a fine, and the defendant, who was sentenced to a fine due to drinking on two occasions in 207 and 2012 as to the crime of this case, again committed the crime of this case even though he/she was sentenced to a fine due to drinking on two occasions in 2007 and 2012, the risk of recidivism is high, and thus, the defendant is likely to commit the crime of this case. However, he/she shall be punished again by a fine, considering the fact that all of the crimes of this case were led to the confession of the crime of this case and his/her depth, the defendant has not been punished due to drinking alcohol exceeding a fine, and

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow