logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2018.02.23 2016고단568
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 21, 2006, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Cheongju District Court’s Assistance, etc. on November 15, 2010, a fine of KRW 2 million for the same crime in the same court on November 15, 2010, and a fine of KRW 4 million for the same crime in the same court on September 27, 2013, respectively.

[Criminal facts] On June 27, 2016, the Defendant driven C rocketing taxi under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.126% from approximately 700 meters from the 700-meter section to the front road of the CU convenience store in the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

As a result, the defendant was punished as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at least twice, and driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. The register of chassiss and driver's licenses of motor vehicles;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a person suspected of violating traffic Acts on roads;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation report (the previous confirmation of criminal history);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the Defendant was punished as a fine for driving under the influence of alcohol in 201, 2006, 2010, and 2013 of the Criminal Procedure Act, he/she again committed the instant crime, and thus, has the risk of recommitting the instant crime, and since the alcohol concentration in the blood was higher than 0.126% at the time of the instant crime, it is not good that the instant crime is committed.

In addition, the defendant appeared on one trial date and notified the sentencing date, but does not appear on the sentencing date, and does not comply with summons.

However, the defendant is led to confession and reflect on the crime of this case, and the driving of drinking and driving without a license has not yet been punished exceeding the fine.

arrow