A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant was suffering from economic difficulties, such as raising living expenses through a credit card return prevention, without any particular occupation. At that time, at that time, the Defendant was able to enter into marriage with the victim B (the age of 26) and the victim as an opportunity to promise marriage. In doing so, the Defendant was able to raise funds for living expenses by lending money under the name of hospital expenses, name of friendship, etc. under the pretext of mutual agreement.

On February 12, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A credit card would be repaid to the victim, if he/she lends the credit card price to the victim, or in the following month” at the Defendant’s residence located in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

As such, the Defendant, as well as the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 150,00 from the victim for the same day as the loan money, and from August 17, 2013, transferred or received KRW 20,930,000 in total from that time to August 17, 2013 as stated in the list of offenses.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A complaint;

1. Copies of bankbooks and details of loans;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on screen pictures;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment (generally, choice of imprisonment);

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of sentencing)

3. The Defendant’s reason for sentencing Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the Defendant repeatedly committed fraud during a considerable period of time, and that the amount of damage therefrom is not considerable.

However, the confession of the crime of this case and reflects the depth of the defendant, there is no record of criminal punishment as the first offender, the amount of damage deposited, the age, character and conduct of the defendant.