A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2015, at around 18:35, the Defendant: (a) carried a household (17 cm in total and 10 cm in length) which is a dangerous object in the new village of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seogu, Seoul, in front of the history of the public and private park (10 cm in total) and carried in an act, such as throwing away waste, such as carcin, in the park, or hanging it into a branch of a Geman; and (b) carried out upon receiving a report, the Defendant: (c) told the police officers, etc. belonging to the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Western Police Station of the Seoul Western Police Station, who carried out the act, and throw away waste, such as carcin, into the left side and right side.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects that are likely to be used for crimes under the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. The recording of a witness T's statement in the third public trial protocol, and the recording of a witness S's statement in the fourth public trial protocol;

1. The witness S, a police officer, was skeing of each on-site photo [the witness S, a police officer, “the defendant conducts preliminary military training in a park,” and was ske of criminal facts (hereinafter referred to as “the above”). The witness S, who was a police officer, was skeing of the instant provisional rank while putting off “the death of the shot,” and committed the instant provisional rank.

A statement is made; ② Witness T, a police officer called back after receiving S’s request for support, was “A witness T, a police officer called up,” and the Defendant was making a statement in the instant case with hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand on the left hand,” ③ the Defendant appears to have suffered a danger of using the instant provisional mail in the crime prescribed by the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, such as having a power to attack a person even around April 5, 2015, adjacent to the date on which the facts of the crime were stated, and ④ there is no evidence that the Defendant could be deemed to have screened the newspaper at the time and place on which the facts of the crime were stated, and there is no special reason to screen the newspaper at a park used by the public, and the Defendant, rather, acted with the Defendant, such as selling trees.