The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On September 11, 2014, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, “The Defendant, a village resident, sent to the other in E-house,” and “The Defendant’s reputation,” regardless of the fact that the victim E did not damage the Defendant’s motor vehicle.

2. In light of the records, it is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's explicit intent under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. The victim can be found to have withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case.

3. According to the conclusion, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.