logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.11.30 2016가단23918
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 30,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from July 30, 2016 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. If one side of the married couple commits a juristic act with a third party in connection with a daily home affairs, the other party shall be jointly and severally liable for the obligation arising therefrom;

(Article 832 of the Civil Act). The term "legal act with respect to one's own family" under Article 832 of the Civil Act refers to a legal act with respect to an ordinary business required in the community of the married couple. The specific scope shall not only be determined according to the social status, property, revenue, and ability of the married couple community, but also according to the community customs, which is the place of the living of the married couple. However, in determining whether the specific legal act is a legal act with respect to one's own family affairs, it shall not include either the internal circumstance of the married couple community or the individual purpose of the act, but also the objective type, nature, etc. of the legal act shall

(2) In light of the following: (a) On April 25, 2000, the Plaintiff borrowed a certificate of loan under the name of the Defendant in its name; (b) on February 12, 2009, the Plaintiff transferred all the loan to the account under the name of the Defendant; (c) on the basis of the entire pleadings, the entire purport of the pleadings in response to the order to submit financial transaction information by the corporate bank support division of this court; and (d) upon the Defendant’s request by the Defendant’s husband, the Plaintiff borrowed a total of KRW 30 million for the purpose of living expenses (i.e., living expenses (i.,, KRW 20 million on August 29, 2014); (c) on September 11, 2014, the Plaintiff received at least KRW 30 million for the purpose of using the loan to the account of the Defendant; and (d) on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s act of transferring the loan to the account of the Defendant’s name was paid to the Defendant’s husband or wife’s dailys daily payment; (i.

arrow