1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff A-301 (hereinafter "the year of this case") in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Area A-202, the plaintiff B-107, the plaintiff A-207, the plaintiff D-301, the plaintiff A-108, the plaintiff Eul-206, the plaintiff Eul-202, the plaintiff Eul-208, the plaintiff Eul-208, the plaintiff Eul-203, the plaintiff Eul-202, the plaintiff Eul-202, the plaintiff Eul-202, the plaintiff Eul-205, the plaintiff Eul-205, the plaintiff Eul-302, the plaintiff Eul-302, the plaintiff Eul-202, the plaintiff Eul-205, the plaintiff Eul-202, the plaintiff Eul-102, the plaintiff Eul-102, the plaintiff A-101, the plaintiff A-107, the plaintiff A-307, the plaintiff A-20, the plaintiff A-300, the plaintiff A-5, and the plaintiff 305-30-1, the plaintiff.

The defendant is the owner of the instant partnership B-203.

B. The establishment of this case is the apartment house of 39 households located on the ground of the "Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Z" (see attached drawings), which is the parcel number of the Gu (see attached drawings), and in order for residents of this case to go into the vacant road, it either runs on the 8m road at the lower place, or go to the 20m road at the lower place, or two length.

In 195, the annual residents of this case moved to the road by passing through the parking lot part of the "Seoul Gangseo-gu AB Ground Building" in order to go to the side of the road.

At the time of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, there was a "AC Bank" on the AB ground of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, but the AC Bank created a parking lot in the part of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Z ground where the instant building is located instead of using it as a road, and used it as a parking lot for bank employees or customers and paid the user fee.

C. At the time of this case’s use fees for the above parking lot were kept by the Plaintiff C, who had been the head of the instant association, and deposited them as a term deposit and led to KRW 28,212,123 on April 30, 2010.

Plaintiff

C transferred KRW 28,212,123 to the spouse of the defendant elected as the head of the Ban on May 10, 2010, and thereafter the defendant kept the parking lot fees.

AC Bank has not paid user fees after its relocation from Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government AB.

(e).