A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 1084]

1. On May 6, 2015, the Defendant paid the victim C interest of KRW 300,000 per month when he/she sent the subject money at the Gangnam-gu Seoul Non-gu’s U.S. Ethical House to the victim C, and the principal may be deducted at any time before a month.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the intent of fact was to receive money from the victim and use it as the cost of the speculative game. Since the game was highly likely to lose money due to high risk, there was no intention or ability to pay the principal and interest even if the victim received money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant - who makes a false statement as above and who is affiliated with the defendant - - 20 million won on May 8, 2015, and the same year.

6.7.5 million won, and the same year.

9. 2.1 million won was transferred to a foreign exchange bank account under the name of the Defendant, and was transferred to the agricultural bank account under the name of the Defendant on May 11, 2015, and was transferred to the agricultural bank account under the name of the Defendant, and was transferred on September 2, 2015, KRW 25 million in total over five times.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

[2017 Highest 1405]

2. The Defendant, from time to time, mentions her mother’s villa, Lestop, etc., was in a scarcity relationship with the victim E by emphasizing her ability. On June 2015, the Defendant called the victim’s cell phone with the victim’s cell phone in the middle of 2015, who lent KRW 20,000 to the victim with the money needed to start her business urgently, will immediately be repaid when the land owned by her horse is sold and sold.

“.....”

However, in fact, the victim was intended to receive money from the victim and use the Internet gambling. Since the above gambling was highly likely to lose money, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay money from the victim, even if he did not receive money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to sell the land in his mother’s name.

Nevertheless, the defendant is the above.