The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and against his mistake; the Defendant’s removal from the university accompanying Malaysia in the event of his long-term sentence in this case; the period of installation of telecommunications equipment in question is not long-term; and the Defendant has no record of punishment in the Republic of Korea.

However, the crime of this case is likely to seriously punish the defendant since the crime of this case is highly harmful because the defendant's participation in the fraud by installing and managing communication equipment to change the phone numbers of the employees of the singing criminal to the domestic mobile phone number. The crime of this case is very poor and very heavy. The crime of singing is hard to regulate because the crime of this case is very secret and organized and it is not easy to recover damage, and it is not easy to recover damage. In particular, since the act of installing and managing communication equipment such as this case can cover a mass amount of the crime of singing, it is more dangerous that the defendant entered Korea for the purpose of singing, and the defendant tried to collect or deliver money after receiving instructions from the officers of the above crime, but it appears that the defendant changed the role of the singing criminal to the attempted crime due to the police officer's inspection and changed the role of the singing criminal act. Nevertheless, the defendant did not deny illegal activities in the investigative agency, but did not recognize the defendant's age and attitude of the victim.