logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.06.20 2019고단2172
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for eight months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. In the case of false misrepresentation of a criminal investigation agency, etc., and the victim's cell phone number is indicated as an international telephone or Internet telephone number when the victim calls in China through the Internet, and the victim's cell phone number is indicated as an international telephone or Internet telephone number, and the victim's cell phone number is asked to receive a telephone without any doubt when the phone number is indicated as a mobile phone number, and the victim is opened and operated a relay station in Korea using the fact that the phone number is indicated as a mobile phone number. The victim's false name (CAEWY) personnel (CAD) provided the defendant with a large number of times (U.I.D. subscriber recognition number for mobile phones) and VoIP MAWA (GTEWAS) with the victim's mobile phone number, and provided the victim with the method of use by deceiving it to many and unspecified persons in order, and then the defendant knew it from the investigation agency in China.

Accordingly, from March 12, 2019, the Defendant: (a) installed a relay office with buildings E, F, nameless lighting staff (C'D'), three mobile equipment, and other communications equipment with high seas; (b) around that time, the Defendant was provided with a large number of convictions, such as “G” through an irregular organization; and (c) relays communications by inserting them into VoIP Swa; and (d) calls the victim H using the above “G” number at a place where it is unknown to China on April 2, 2019, where it is impossible to know from April 12:04, 2019; (b) the fact that the victim’s account was used for committing fraud; (c) the public prosecutor belonging to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office, although the victim’s account was not used for committing fraud; and (d) the account was opened to the account held in the name of the principal’s account.

arrow