Defendant

A The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for nine months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving of a sports cargo vehicle C.

On November 25, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.063% among blood transfusions on November 25, 2016, and is in Bosung-gun D, the two-lane roads in front of the Ecom was driven along the boundary of Bosung-Eup, Bosung-Eup.

At the time, the road is at night and at the right right side, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce the speed and drive safely by taking into account well the right side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected the above duty of care and neglected the 21.5m volume of the 21.5m color of the above cargo vehicle, which was driven by the victim B (48 cm) who is driving ahead of the same direction, was driving by the victim B (48 cm).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, i.e., the 12 weeks of the number of days of treatment due to the above occupational negligence, such as the joints of the satisfaction of the 1st day of the right satisfaction, the joints of the joints of the 1st day.

2. Defendant B

A. On November 25, 2016, the Defendant driving a two-wheeled vehicle with an engine device license with approximately 0.073% alcohol concentration in blood at the 15km section from around 15 meters to around the Eelher road, without obtaining a motor device bicycle license, while under the influence of alcohol, from around 19:10 to around 19:10 on November 25, 2016.

B. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of a two-wheeled vehicle F125cc.

In spite of the fact that anyone is prohibited from driving a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, the defendant was driving the two-wheeled motor vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph.

b)a summary of the evidence;