A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

. After having access to the Kacona’s “China”, a notice was posted to the effect that the victim D who contacted the Kakakaox would sell the above Twit pockets in KRW 289,000, and that it was forged by the victim’s account (Account Number: 1331******019) in the name of the company bank account (Account Number) in the name of the victim.

2. On December 11, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, although there was no intent or ability to purchase contact diskettes, the Defendant posted a notice stating that “I would obtain F Concket” by accessing Internet Nene “Niber” camera, and then contact the victim with “I will sell and deliver 160,000 won” and “I will deliver it to the 160,000 won,” and then, in that sense, the Defendant acquired from the victim the corporate bank account (Account Number: 0411-**********99) in the name of the Agricultural Bank account (Account Number) in the name of A, No. 100,000 won (Account Number: 041-*****-19) in the name of the victim, by taking over KRW 160,000,000, in total, including 60,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Copies of the Kakaogle conversation;

1. Each specification of transactions;

1. Previous records: Application of the statutes governing criminal records, court rulings, such as subparagraph 2, subparagraph 655, and subparagraph 2, subparagraph 1, 2015No121, etc.;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 39 (1) of the same Act for concurrent crimes;

1. Among concurrent offenders, each of the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 1000,000) and each of the reasons for sentencing under Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 1 (amended by Presidential Decree No. 10060, Jun. 2, 199) [No. 1] the scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple concurrent offenders who are not a person with a special penalty]: from June to two years [Pronouncement Decision]; the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime; and the damage recovery has not been