The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Parts of innocence

1. On August 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 16:30 on August 2, 2015, the Defendant was the victim E (nive, 49 years of age) who sells the betting convenience on the street in front of the D cafeteria located in the Busan Jung-gu C market; (b) was the customer; (c) however, the Defendant was waiting for the customer from the next side to the D cafeteria that sells the betting convenience.

The defendant laid the victim's interest so that he could not go beyond the report of the victim's guest.

This victim made an objection and caused the son to the son, “I am the son of another son.”

“The knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-g

2. The Defendant asserts to the effect that even though there was a sponsoring of plastics in a dispute between the victim and the victim at the time and place indicated in the facts charged of this case, the Defendant did not have any injury to the victim.

먼저 피고인이 피해자의 양쪽 무릎을 발로 찬 사실이 있는지 여부에 대해 살피건대, 이 부분 공소사실에 직접 부합하는 증거로는 제 3회 공판 조서 및 경찰 진술 조서에서의 피해자 E의 진술이 유일 하나, 증인 F의 법정 진술, 피고인에 대한 경찰 피의자신문 조서의 피고인의 진술 등에 비추어 보면, 피해자의 진술만으로는 피고인이 피해자의 양쪽 무릎을 직접 발로 찼다는 공소사실을 인정하기에 부족하고, 달리 이를 인정할 뚜렷한 증거가 없다.

Next, according to the case of injury of the victim, the witness F's legal statement, the victim's upper body photograph, etc., the defendant was scare or knee-knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne

Even if a doctor G's opinion is prepared, knee-knee-path standing.