beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Criminal facts
The Defendant, along with B, is a person who operates a massage treatment establishment in the name of “D” in the Seocho-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and a blind person E is a person who has registered the massage treatment establishment in his/her name and works as a massage operator at the place of the massage treatment in his/her name.
The defendant in collusion with B and E from June 5, 2013 to the same year.
7. By the end of 30, 300 won, 170,000 won, credit card holders were treated disadvantageously on the ground that they are traded by credit card by giving guidance to 170,000 won and 180,000 won in cash from unspecified men who found the place at the place at the place at the place at the place at the place at the place at the place at the place at the place at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point at the point
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a daily account book, abstract, and credit card copy;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 70 (3) 4 and 19 (1) of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, and selection of fines;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order appears to have not yet been the substantial profit gained by the defendant from the crime of this case, the defendant has no same criminal records, the defendant has no same criminal records, the fact that it is seriously against the defendant, and surrenders to investigation agencies, etc., shall be determined by taking into account all the sentencing factors indicated in the oral argument,