The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

On September 18, 2018, the Defendant, in the factory, introduced the Victim B (B), who was 35 years of age, to the original state of the Gangwon-do. However, the Defendant, in addition to the above owner of the business, went to Gwangju where the victims and their parents reside together with the above owner of the business, who was informed that the victim was dead in the status of being unable to pay the advanced payment and that the contact was not made.

The Defendant sent C’s message to the effect that the Defendant did not meet the Defendant’s request for delivery, and sent the message prior to his house and the pictures taken of the apartment entrance to the victim, and threatened the victim as if the victim did not meet, with any danger and injury.

However, the crime of this case cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent (Article 283 (3) and (1) of the Criminal Act). Since a document containing the victim's expression of intention not to punish the defendant has been submitted to this court, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.